Hmmm -- seems as though I set a cat amongst the pigeons.............

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Helen Swart <[email protected]> wrote:

>  The alarm in the wendy house behind the exit at the OCA parking lot is
> 246.34 pm we also get charged 133.95 for patrols..
>
> Helen
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Gill Gimberg <[email protected]>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 14, 2010 2:10 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [obsnw] ADT- FYI
>
>  Good idea Trevor.
>
> I'm paying R297.26 incl. VAT and have been a subscriber for - I think - 5
> years plus. It is unacceptable that the longer one has been a subscriber,
> the more one pays! What about loyalty? Ridiculous policy.
>
> Gill
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Trevor Hughes <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Gill Gimberg <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> I have a contract with ADT. I think this kind of thing is unacceptable:
>>> either your service is worth the monthly contract fee, or it isn't. I have
>>> suspected ADT of doing this kind of wheeler-dealing, but am not sure yet how
>>> to address it. Any ideas from anybody else? I realise they need to keep
>>> clients, but in the long term the non-complaining clients will end up paying
>>> for the reduced-fee clients, not to mention new contracts at special prices,
>>> etc.
>>>
>>>
>>> Power could be with the people if the people stood together - a difficult
>> thing to organise in OBS. If all ADT subscribers said we want to pay R200 a
>> month (About R100 less than I am paying) then it would probably happen. I
>> know I am paying substantially more than a a frined who has been with them
>> for about 18 months - I have been a subscriber for 10 years or so.
>>
>> Maybe if each ADT subscriber on the group put forward what they are paying
>> we woudl be able to negotiate a better rate - after all its the same area
>> and the same service
>>
>> I;ll start the ball rolling by saying ADT charge me R369-74 at home and
>> R388-82 at work (just been increased by 4.4 %)
>>
>> Lets hear what you are paying
>>
>> Trev
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "The Observatory Neighbourhood watch" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected] <obsnw%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/obsnw?hl=en.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Gill Gimberg
> Editor / Writer
> 084-683 6230
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The Observatory Neighbourhood watch" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected] <obsnw%[email protected]>.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/obsnw?hl=en.
>
>   --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The Observatory Neighbourhood watch" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected] <obsnw%[email protected]>.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/obsnw?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Observatory Neighbourhood watch" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/obsnw?hl=en.

Reply via email to