I would certainly love to see the highly useful Anonymous Checkout
Process example used in OFBiz - at least until someone else comes up
with a good reason to remove Dojo and go to a different front end
framewok. Does anyone have any real objections to doing this in
light of the fact that no one has another example _and_ that the
checkout process is unnecessarily tedious?
Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6594
On Dec 15, 2006, at 12:07 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Here are my two cents about this interesting thread:
1) the Ajax toolkit's license must be fully compatible with the
OFBiz license
2) even if it's a good thing to try to find one official Ajax
toolkit for OFBiz now and finally get this ball running, I think we
should do this but also review the decision (and the results we'll
get with the adopted framework) in 2-4 months from now and possibly
return on it; I mean that we should keep an open-minded approach
and also consider new solutions (or criticism to the adopted
toolkit) since I think that in the Ajax world the effects of the
'software darwinism' (http://www.apache.org/foundation/
glossary.html#SoftwareDarwinism) still are not mature
Jacopo
A. Zeneski wrote:
I'll let this thread run a little while longer before we say to
have a
full official vote. As of right now, it appears most people are
looking
at Dojo, and that is fine with me.
It seems that most of these toolkits do the same thing, so to me its
just a matter of making a decision so I can push forward with my
work.
As for being more active on the lists, sorry I have been MIA for so
long. I've been involved in a lot of custom (non open source) work
as of
late and apologize for not being around. I will do my best to be
here as
much as possible. Thanks!
Andrew
