Tim, To your post http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-510#action_12458496
I would want to see it degrade. The fact that SVN OFBiz does not degrade should not be support to introduce more code that follows a poor pattern. The current state of OFBiz not being able to add to cart when JS is turned off needs to be reported as a bug and fixed. Wanting to see this degrade should especially be true for a functionality of "Anonymous" checkout. This means you're wanting to sell product to random people. So, if you're wanting to sell to random people, you would want to lower the barriers as far as possible for them to use your site. Good web surfing practice is to white list JS for sites that you trust. This is especially true in corporate environments. So to summarize, my two cents would be to report the add to cart bug to JIRA, fix OFBiz's SVN of this pattern and degrade the JS in the anonymous checkout patch. But to quickly see this kind of functionality into OFBiz, I would prefer to see it added to a sandbox so that others could help work out these peculiarities. --- Tim Ruppert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would certainly love to see the highly useful > Anonymous Checkout > Process example used in OFBiz - at least until > someone else comes up > with a good reason to remove Dojo and go to a > different front end > framewok. Does anyone have any real objections to > doing this in > light of the fact that no one has another example > _and_ that the > checkout process is unnecessarily tedious? > > Cheers, > Tim > -- > Tim Ruppert > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > o:801.649.6594 > f:801.649.6594 > > > On Dec 15, 2006, at 12:07 AM, Jacopo Cappellato > wrote: > > > Here are my two cents about this interesting > thread: > > > > 1) the Ajax toolkit's license must be fully > compatible with the > > OFBiz license > > 2) even if it's a good thing to try to find one > official Ajax > > toolkit for OFBiz now and finally get this ball > running, I think we > > should do this but also review the decision (and > the results we'll > > get with the adopted framework) in 2-4 months from > now and possibly > > return on it; I mean that we should keep an > open-minded approach > > and also consider new solutions (or criticism to > the adopted > > toolkit) since I think that in the Ajax world the > effects of the > > 'software darwinism' > (http://www.apache.org/foundation/ > > glossary.html#SoftwareDarwinism) still are not > mature > > > > Jacopo > > > > A. Zeneski wrote: > >> I'll let this thread run a little while longer > before we say to > >> have a > >> full official vote. As of right now, it appears > most people are > >> looking > >> at Dojo, and that is fine with me. > >> It seems that most of these toolkits do the same > thing, so to me its > >> just a matter of making a decision so I can push > forward with my > >> work. > >> As for being more active on the lists, sorry I > have been MIA for so > >> long. I've been involved in a lot of custom (non > open source) work > >> as of > >> late and apologize for not being around. I will > do my best to be > >> here as > >> much as possible. Thanks! > >> Andrew > >
