Hi Sjur, On 11/02/2010 03:36 PM, Sjur Brændeland wrote: > Hi Denis, > > Fredric wrote: >> On positioning framework side, XML containers encoding/decoding does not >> seem to be yet widely used, while the support of RRC and RRLP framing is >> common, thanks to the support of SUPL. >> >> Using XML and 27.007 format would be great as long as long as ofono is not >> obliged to interpret the XML containers. > > Denis, is this something you would consider as an option, to transport > both ASN.1 coded RRC / RRLP frames > and XML transparently over the oFono API ? >
The question here is really about what has the best chance of being accepted as 'official' API prefixed with org.ofono. I don't see the binary variant having a chance of being accepted right now. With XML I can see it becoming the official API since it is defined by 27.007. Having said that, both can indeed co-exist side-by-side. What are the possible reasons as to why oFono might need to peek inside the XML? > Regards, > Sjur Regards, -Denis _______________________________________________ ofono mailing list ofono@ofono.org http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
