Peter Tribble wrote: > That's broken. It takes the bad and broken system we have at present > and makes it even more bureaucratic and unmanageable. > The proposed system improves what we have now because it adds an overall community-wide standard specifying what a Member is but let's the groups fill in the details that apply to their situation. It's a quick quality check, basically, and what's cool about it is that it adds no bureaucracy at all.
Jim -- http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris/
