John Plocher wrote: > > I think it is safe to say that most (if not all) of us are distressed > by the *way* that the Indiana project was initiated and developed > outside the view of the community and by the *way* it was positioned > as the sole recipient of the OpenSolaris name. "Legalisticly", > according to the charter and constitution, what Sun did was perfectly > OK; from a social values/"equal footing community participant" > perspective, however, many feel betrayed because the above principles > were violated, and they feel that Sun no longer is playing by the same > rules it set down 3 years ago. > > -John > ____ > [1] http://www.opensolaris.org/os/about/
+100 Yes, the way in which it was pushed through has been most hurting and saddening. The other questions are of second rank. -- %martin
