On Jan 20, 2008 11:46 PM, Shawn Walker <swalker at opensolaris.org> wrote:
(section I). >> Belenix/Kindiana/Indiana and Schillix teams. Have you reached out to >> the PowerPC, Nexenta and MartUX teams yet? I don't see any of their >> team members listed in the core contributor list, and their input into >> this proposal / process would strengthen it as an accurate >> representation of the community's needs and goals. Those individuals are not represented merely because I don't know they > are or because they don't participate within the OpenSolaris community > to a point where they are visible to me as someone that would be > interested in distribution decisions. > [snip...] (section II....) > 5) You comment that, "the tools necessary to build a distribution are > > quickly reaching maturity." The "tools necessary to build a distro" > > have been in use by the various distros for quite some time. Are the > > tools you are referring to Indiana specific tools? If so, is using > > these tools a prerequisite for membership in the proposed distro CG? > > Is so, what do you propose for distros that use different tool-chains? > > (e.g. - Nexenta, and MartUX). > > I'm not aware of any "Indiana-specific" tools that exist currently. If you're not aware of MarTUX and Schillix, and not aware of IPS and the distro constructor tools, I would say that you are not an appropriate person to be putting forth a proposal that has political implementations for the entire community. This is kind of an absurd proposal, at least until someone with a bit more of the "whole picture" in mind adopts and substantially clarifies it. -1, yuck factor. --elijah -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/attachments/20080121/e49ef659/attachment.html>
