"Brian Gupta" <brian.gupta at gmail.com> wrote: > Shawn, > > It looks like you plan to have representation from > Belenix/Kindiana/Indiana and Schillix teams. Have you reached out to
What is "kindiana"? > the PowerPC, Nexenta and MartUX teams yet? I don't see any of their > team members listed in the core contributor list, and their input into > this proposal / process would strengthen it as an accurate > representation of the community's needs and goals. (They are not > mentioned in your proposal, but are OpenSolaris distros based on the > existing ARC approved O/N source tree.). > > John's notes about forking O/N concern me. It "seems" to me to be a > bypass of the ARC process, creating a separate O/N "fork" for Indiana > based distros. The ARC process could be called a bypass of the OpenSolaris process. When I created SchilliX, I had to modify ON in order to make it work. Nobody from the Sun team was interested to discuss the problems I had. It seems that forking ON is the expected method for creating a distro. J?rg -- EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily