"Brian Gupta" <brian.gupta at gmail.com> wrote:

> Shawn,
>
> It looks like you plan to have representation from
> Belenix/Kindiana/Indiana and Schillix teams. Have you reached out to

What is "kindiana"?

> the PowerPC, Nexenta and MartUX teams yet?  I don't see any of their
> team members listed in the core contributor list, and their input into
> this proposal / process would strengthen it as an accurate
> representation of the community's needs and goals.  (They are not
> mentioned in your proposal, but are OpenSolaris distros based on the
> existing ARC approved O/N source tree.).
>
> John's notes about forking O/N concern me. It "seems" to me to be a
> bypass of the ARC process, creating a separate O/N "fork" for Indiana
> based distros.

The ARC process could be called a bypass of the OpenSolaris process.

When I created SchilliX, I had to modify ON in order to make it work.
Nobody from the Sun team was interested to discuss the problems I had.
It seems that forking ON is the expected method for creating a distro.

J?rg

-- 
 EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       js at cs.tu-berlin.de                (uni)  
       schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de     (work) Blog: 
http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily

Reply via email to