Bill Sommerfeld writes: > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 07:30 -0400, James Carlson wrote: > > There certainly should be, and the path should > > go to a community group and then (if unresolved) up to the OGB. > > I'm not sure what you mean by "a" community group here -- are you > expecting to create a new "arc appeals community", or to pick the > community most specific to the case and have them review it?
That's part of the problem of not having a defined path. At a guess, it'd be the existing Architecture Process and Tools Community that would be the expected host of such an appeal Hosting it in the community most specific seems odd to me, but I'd be interested in hearing a better process. > A problem with the latter is that there may be conflicts in priorities > between multiple community groups. As a not entirely hypothetical > example, consider "security" vs "approachability"... That's the whole point to having a global ARC. You need some place to resolve those things. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
