James Carlson wrote: > Mark A. Carlson writes: > >> It seems the most expedient thing to do then would be >> to create such an ARC case and re-host this discussion >> there where it would be more appropriate and germane to >> that case. >> >> I would be happy if J?rg were to summarize his objections >> to the already approved case in an email as a Minority >> Opinion and we were to end the discussion there. >> > > The case under discussion is a fast-track and has already been > approved. Fast-tracks don't get written opinions, so there's no > vehicle here, and Joerg is not an ARC member, and thus can't write a > minority opinion. > > We could create a new case that proposes using star as-is (with no > compatibility fixes) as a replacement for /usr/bin/tar, and then vote > on the case. I suspect it'd be denied, and that it'd be a waste of > time. > > However, a summary of objections as a parting shot (and not as an > official "Minority Opinion") would be reasonable. I'd even suggest > creating a "joerg-objection.txt" file in the case directory to hold > that summary for future generations. > 100% agree and was my original intention. Kinda inventing procedure for open cases as we go.
-- mark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/attachments/20070816/5b1bdc70/attachment.html>
