Michelle Olson wrote:
> Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>> michelle olson wrote:
>>
>>> Collective: Roles
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> User Group: User, User with ssh key, Admin, Leader, Member
>>> Project: Admin, Leader, Member
>>> Working Committee: Admin, Leader, Member
>>>
>>> This assumes the following changes:
>>> -Communities migrate to Projects -User Groups migrate to their new
>>> collective
>>> -We add Member as a role within Projects
>>> -We migrate Contributors to Leaders
>>> -We migrate Core Contributors to Members
>>>
>>
>> This seems backwards to me - Core Contributors should become Project
>> Leaders,
>> and Contributors should become Project Members.
> Member has a vote, so that is why CCs would migrate to Members.
> Contributors have no vote, so they would migrate to Project Leaders.
> Does this make sense? 'Member' as defined in our meetings and in the
> Constitution is a voting contributor.
But Leader implies more rights than Member, not less, and projects should
have fewer Leaders than Members. (And I'm assuming you mean a member of
the project, not a Voting Member of the OpenSolaris community at large.)
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
