Michelle Olson wrote: > Alan Coopersmith wrote: >> michelle olson wrote: >> >>> Collective: Roles >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> User Group: User, User with ssh key, Admin, Leader, Member >>> Project: Admin, Leader, Member >>> Working Committee: Admin, Leader, Member >>> >>> This assumes the following changes: >>> -Communities migrate to Projects >>> -User Groups migrate to their new collective >>> -We add Member as a role within Projects >>> -We migrate Contributors to Leaders >>> -We migrate Core Contributors to Members >>> >> This seems backwards to me - Core Contributors should become Project Leaders, >> and Contributors should become Project Members. > Member has a vote, so that is why CCs would migrate to Members. > Contributors have no vote, so they would migrate to Project Leaders. > Does this make sense? 'Member' as defined in our meetings and in the > Constitution is a voting contributor. >> I'm not sure what the >> difference between Admin & Leader is for a Project - what privileges does >> each get? > Admin is the person who sets up the Project pages initially. Leader has > edit privs and SCM privs.
As and example: Currently in the Testing Community we have 17 Contributors and 16 CCs with only 3 people that can edit the webpages, in addition, Contributors are all over the map, I don't think a simple: Contributor -> Project Leader (website editor) will work in our case. BTW. In the Test Dev project it's more of a one to one relationship. Cheers, Jim
