On Jun 19, 2008, at 20:28, John Plocher wrote: > [replying to onesself on a high volume thread - 30 lashes!] > > John Plocher wrote: >>> Admin is the person who sets up the Project pages initially. >>> Leader has >>> edit privs and SCM privs. >> >> Neither of these are constitutional roles, and IMO are out of scope >> for the OGB to define. > > Ergh, > > /me realizes that the "admin or "leader" stuff might map into the > Facilitator role, which *is* a constitutional role and very much > in scope. Sorry about the blindspot :-)
Well caught. In the simple model I've been envisioning, each of the top-level groups that the OGB directly approves would have a nominated contact point who the OGB would contact for information such as a quarterly activity report, and who the OGB would empower to actually perform the AddVotingRights() method and UseCommunityResources() methods. Apart from that, all the other roles discussion seems to me requirements gathering for the web system rather than governance discussion. S.
