Darren.Reed at sun.com wrote: > Sara Dornsife wrote: > >> >>> It's inline with what I expected which is why in the original >>> email I cc'd the OGB because unless they have delegated >>> control over this to the advocacy forum, advocacy-discuss >>> has no authority to make any decisions. Point here being >>> that there is no "advocacy community", heck there isn't >>> even an "opensolaris" community for "opensolaris-discuss" >>> to belong to, for there to be any leaders within so we have >>> to fall back to the OGB. >> >> >> There is advocacy community. It is a combination of the User Groups, >> Marketing and Immigrants Communities. The OGB, via Steve Lau, have >> already spoken up and stated that this isn't a decision for the OGB - >> which I wholeheartedly agree with. > > > If there is such a thing as an "advocacy community" then: > - why isn't it listed on the opensolaris.org website as one of > the communities? > - why aren't there nominated leaders for it? And if there > are, who are they? > > Lets start with seeing these basic issues addressed first. > > It's all well and good to go and create a discussion forum > and declare it a community (seems like a sham to me) but > if you want it to at least appear relevant within the opensolaris > sphere then it needs to be listed on our communities page > and have leaders appointed.
The merger was just approved recently, so the website reorganisation is still happening to reflect the organisation. Threads as recent as this weekend have been started to try and organise the effort. cheers, steve -- stephen lau // stevel at sun.com | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net opensolaris // solaris kernel development
