Hmm... didn't the new OGB *just* get installed a week ago? I mean
transitions take time.
Matt
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Garrett D'Amore <garr...@damore.org> wrote:
> On 04/12/10 06:30 PM, Ben Rockwood wrote:
>
>> I appeal to the board for information regarding OpenSolaris 2010.03 and
>> the development model of Indiana.
>>
>> We've all wanted great clarity from Oracle regarding a great many
>> things, but the extent to which this board has the authority to demand
>> answers is highly questionable (even Sun wouldn't provide them)...
>> therefore I am not concerned with these matters; that is, anything to do
>> with Solaris(tm).
>>
>> However, the OpenSolaris distribution ("Indiana") is reasonably within
>> the jurisdiction of the board. The 6 month development cycle as set
>> down by Ian Murdock has always been questionable, however there has been
>> no reasonable communication to the community with regards to the delays
>> in 2010.03.
>>
>>
>
> Why do you think the OGB has any control or jurisdiction over the
> OpenSolaris distribution? When did Sun or Oracle hand over those reins?
>
> If memory serves, the previous releases of OpenSolaris were always managed
> and marketed by Sun, as a Sun product.
>
> - Garrett
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ogb-discuss mailing list
> ogb-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ogb-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
ogb-discuss mailing list
ogb-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ogb-discuss
