If it isn't human readable, it isn't clearly indicated. That seems pretty clear to me.
This message is released under the Open Game License v1.0a. All content within double brackets is hereby designated Open Game Content.
[[Gur Dhvpx Oebja Sbk Whzcf Bire gur Ynml Qbt.]]
Nobody says that OGC has to be (1) readable by any particular person or (2) sensible. You are perfectly able to contribute nonsense as OGC. The license makes no distincition between garbage OGC, and OGC that looks like garbage but could be rendered meaningful with additional information. (Nor between garbage OGC and useful OGC--that's just not the license's job.)
A while ago, Ryan Dancey even put forth the proposition that it would be perfectly legal to distribute something under the WotC OGL as a binary bitstream, and designate OGC as "bits 23560-31197", or somesuch, assuming that's really where the binary encoding of the OGC was.
<assume inserted copy of WotC OGL with proper Sec.15 here> -- woodelf <*> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://webpages.charter.net/woodelph/
The avalanche has already begun. It is too late for the pebbles to vote. -- Kosh _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
