Doug Meerschaert wrote: >Why not just fulfill this gamer's fantasy, and include a page or two highlighting what parts are significantly different from the "norm".
That's a possibility, too (tips to GR)... ~Jimmy Domsalla, QTGG ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Meerschaert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 6:20 PM Subject: Re: [Ogf-l] "compatible" claims > jdomsalla wrote: > > >In the Introduction, after the part where I hail and praise open gaming, I > >intend to include a small section where I indicate incompatibility issues > >with other gaming products *will likely* occur. I wish to indicate the > >following... > > > > > Why not just fulfill this gamer's fantasy, and include a page or two > highlighting what parts are significantly different from the "norm". It > wouldn't even have to hit everything, just the key points for somone who > has extant game knowledge that will run into some pitfalls. > > Not a single one of the half-dozen odd SRD-variant games I have includes > a "this is what's different" page. Even worse, game companies don't > even include such a page even when they have clear copyright to the base > system--WotC's d20 books and White Wolf's Storyteller books are two > great examples of places where this would be useful, and simply isn't > included. > > > DM > _______________________________________________ > Ogf-l mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l > > __________ NOD32 1.615 (20040202) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 Antivirus System. > http://www.nod32.com > > _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
