On Apr 26, 2004, at 8:03 AM, Joe Mucchiello wrote:
And one of those amicus briefs would be the clarifying license. The more people signed onto using the clarifying license, the more weight it carries in a court.
And in practical terms, this would amount to a dozen or a thousand fleas insisting the dog use the shampoo they like best. It depends on the dog. In this case, if WotC is not actively interested (or at least not inclined to actively resist), there's no point: all the rest of us together are, well, we've got more audience share than (say) the existing body of Fudge or Fuzion material, but it's just not the same. And I just don't see that WotC has a corporate interest in anything that's going to significantly reduce its freedom to act precisely as pleases. It's remarkable that the OGL got adopted in the first place; it'd be foolish to expect even the slightest additional complication to pass muster with them.
_______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
