There is some bickering, that's true. Most everyone tries to get along. But there are, as I understand, various hard feelings here or there over past products or prior dealings or from events at prior employment, etc. But it isnt as contentious as you paint it.
Well, i don't mean to suggest a continuous hellhole of argument. Just that there are some serious disagreements unlikely to ever get resolved.
Believe me, if there was some need to standardize this amongst the "big kids" it would get done IMHO. Despite differences, if there was a big problem, the industry is small enough that a few phone calls could get things resolved.
That's my reading, too.
The real problem is that usually the pitch man for some "universal" resolution of things usually (1) has some agenda, (2) is not an actual publisher and is busy focusing on goofy hypothetical problems that dont affect actual use of the license in any serious way, (3) lacks serious credibility as the leader of the project (goes hand in hand with 2), (4) has no business vision, (5) hasnt demonstrated an ability to get the project done, and (6) has sort of an "anti-big guy" fringe bias.
These are also all excellent points.
_______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
