Ah look. Just another example of "publishers working together in enlightened self-interest." How bucolic and utopian.
:) Lets all put that crack pipe away, shall we. :) Clark PS--sorry, I wasnt trying to single you guys out. You know I like both of you guys. But I thought it might be an interesting example to help those who have this dreamy illusion of enlightened publishers working together to craft the common good of the game. Heck, we cant even agree on logos. We cant even agree whether we agree on logos. We cant even agree if we are on the right list to talk about our disagreement on logos. So I guess my point is (and you guys are my unwitting pieces of evidence) that it is rather pie in the skie (or should I say Orc and Pie in the Sky) to think that we publishers can really unite in any grand way. It hasnt really worked and I dont see it working in the future. Clark again. Hey, wasnt this a PS? That got rather long... --- Mark Clover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Steve, you know full well my mention of "negativity" > was in regard to > your rudeness, ala - "Then the thing you need to > consider, Mark, is > which of our goals is actually looking at what the > people on the list > here are talking about" (basically telling me to > shut up if my goals > differ). Twisting it to imply I wasn't interested > in constructive > criticism is just another example of the very > problem that drives > people away from posting in the first place. > > As always, > Mark Clover > www.CreativeMountainGames.com > > _______________________________________________ > Ogf-l mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
