On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Martin L. Shoemaker wrote: > > Please don't try to paint one side in this scenario as AUTOMATICALLY morally > superior to the other. Both sides are capable of abuse. > I totally agree both sides are capable of abuse. I just think that people don't equate closing off some open content as serious. Maybe this is because there is no identifiable victim to sympathize with. But having a few people stake off domain modifications of open content as closed will kill the movement a lot faster than a few people being disgruntled or hesitant to do D20 stuff. ------------- For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
- RE: [Open_Gaming] The Spi... Doug Meerschaert
- RE: [Open_Gaming] The Spi... Martin L. Shoemaker
- RE: [Open_Gaming] The Spi... R. Hyrum Savage
- RE: [Open_Gaming] The Spi... Martin L. Shoemaker
- Brooks and Tolkien (was R... Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Open_Gaming] The Spirit and the Letter Kal Lin
- RE: [Open_Gaming] The Spirit and the Letter Martin L. Shoemaker
- Re: [Open_Gaming] The Spirit and the Letter Andrew Hackard
- Re: [Open_Gaming] The Spirit and the Lette... Kal Lin
- RE: [Open_Gaming] The Spirit and the L... Martin L. Shoemaker
- Re: [Open_Gaming] The Spirit and the L... Andrew Hackard
- Re: [Open_Gaming] The Spirit and t... Kal Lin
- Re: [Open_Gaming] The Spirit ... Andrew Hackard
- Re: [Open_Gaming] The Spi... Kal Lin
- Re: [Open_Gaming] The Spi... John of the Collective
- [Open_Gaming] NDA & WOTC legal Tim Dugger
- Re: [Open_Gaming] NDA & W... J. Michael Looney
- [Open_Gaming] NDA/SRD/Etc... Lizard
- Re: [Open_Gaming] NDA/SRD... J. Michael Looney
- Re: [Open_Gaming] NDA/SRD... Damian Smart
