> Ryan S. Dancey > > If the two books were presented as described (combined into one unit and > connected together by a binding element - shrink-wrap in this > case), the law > would see that as one publication and it would not be legal under > the terms > of the D20STL. > > You might as well claim that different signatures in a book were > a different > work; since the only thing they share in common is being glued to > the spine. I can't say I'm surprised, it seemed like too obvious a dodge for Legal to have overlooked. Of course, the could still have the second book as a free download... I expect we'll see some of this going on, but probably not enough to REALLY matter. -Brad ------------- For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
- RE: [Open_Gaming] "Open" Debate Corey Reid
- Re: [Open_Gaming] "Open" Debate Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Open_Gaming] "Open" Debate Infinite Possibilities
- Re: [Open_Gaming] "Open" Debate Christopher DeLisle
- Re: [Open_Gaming] "Open" Debate John Kim
- Re: [Open_Gaming] "Open" Debate Christopher DeLisle
- Re: [Open_Gaming] "Open" Debate John of the Collective
- RE: [Open_Gaming] "Open" Debate Corey Reid
- RE: [Open_Gaming] "Open" Debate Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] "Open" Debate Ryan S. Dancey
- RE: [Open_Gaming] "Open" Deb... Brad Thompson
- RE: [Open_Gaming] "Open" Debate Corey Reid
- RE: [Open_Gaming] "Open" Debate Mathew Gray
- Re: [Open_Gaming] "Open" Debate Christopher DeLisle
- Re: [Open_Gaming] "Open" Debate Christopher DeLisle
- Re: [Open_Gaming] "Open" Debate Chris DeLisle
- RE: [Open_Gaming] "Open" Debate Corey Reid
- RE: [Open_Gaming] "Open" Debate LaPierre, Bob
- RE: [Open_Gaming] "Open" Debate Mathew Gray
