Re: [Open_Gaming] Final Text of Approved Open Gaming License

[John Kim]

On Sat, 16 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > I am protesting the fact that the intentionally misleading notion 
> > of "independence from WotC" is being so blatantly advanced.
> 
> Your basing you conclusions on the premise that the Open Gaming Foundation 
> could not exist without the OGL.  That isn't correct.  From what I 
> understand, the OGF would not object to the use of other types of 
> open gaming licenses.

        Hm. The OGF website used to mention FUDGE and Dominion Games, 
but now all mention of them has been removed.  The Registry 
says that it is a list of only "OGL and D20" products.  

        Perhaps this was an oversight on Ryan's part.  A question 
to Ryan: Could the OGF website again mention other (non-WotC) games 
that were made open before the OGF existed -- like FUDGE, Lycadican, 
and Circe?  Could it include copies of the licenses under which 
these games were released alongside the Wizards of the Coast OGL?  
Should we enter these games into the OGF Registry?  

- John


-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org