On 9/27/00 3:29 PM, Ryan S. Dancey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote

>No way.
>
>It's not a license - it's a statement of intent.  There's no offer,
>acceptance or consideration; it's not a binding contract using the statute
>of frauds.
>
>It doesn't give anyone any rights; it just gives them a little piece of mind
>about doing something that's totally illegal.

I'd like to point out to the members of the list that members of the D&D 
fan community have taken it upon themselves to consult with lawyers on 
this very issue, and were given answers that differed greatly from Mr. 
Dancey's answer above.

While I'm not a lawyer and I am not stating verbatim what was said, the 
gist of it is that it would be very difficult indeed for WotC to go after 
fan sites after saying that it was okay to make use of their material.  I 
heartily encourage anyone curious about the issue to seek legal opinions 
themselves.  Remember, WotC's legal team is not a source of unbiased 
opinion on the issue, nor is any employee of WotC.  It's often a mistake 
to take a corporations proclamations about what is and isn't legal at 
face value, they can, do, and will misrepresent legalities when they feel 
it is in their interests*

* for an example, call up any recording company, and ask if it's legal to 
tape a CD you own for purposes of listening to it on your car stero.  
You'll as likely as not be told that it is illegal.  It is not only 
legal, it is specifically stated that it is legal in the law.

-- 
Russ Taylor (http://www.cmc.net/~rtaylor/)
CMC Tech Support Manager

Duke Phillips:  Why do you have to be so critical?
Jay Sherman:    I'm a critic. It's my job.
Duke Phillips:  No, your job is to rate movies on a scale from "good"
                to "excellent".
Jay Sherman:    What if I don't like them?
Duke Phillips:  That's what "good" is for.

-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org

Reply via email to