At 12:44 AM 4/19/2001 +0000, "Faustus von Goethe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It would have provisions also, that limited both the PI and the PROFIT
>motive. In short these provisions would be structured to create a "safe
>harbor" for contributors of content that they wanted to make "open" but
>that do not want to become part of a partially closed,
>produced-for-profit, work.
The Open Content License has restrictions on the commercial use of content that
sound compatible with what you're trying to do with a "Free20" mark.
Personally, I was more interested in "Free20" when I thought it was a mark for
D20 material that is 100 percent open content. I'm eager to support
publishers who
are doing that with their OGL/D20 work.
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
