>But to the license, does tucked away in an attribute flag of my XML >satisfy the clear indication clause? Any reasonable person or >reasonable gamer only has the rendered version to go by.
so long as somewhere (on the OGL page, frex), it says that you have to look there if you want to know if it's OGC, sure. >But does an ALT tag, which you have to move the mouse over the image >to discover, clearly identify something? If you're willing to take >the heat of that, that's your business. But I don't see why you >wouldn't want to provide the text with the picture so that the >printed copy will display it as well. if you're relying on the user to discover this? maybe. but if it says on the title page "all OGC artwork is indicated via ALT tags, which most viewers will display upon mouseover", or words to that effect, sure. how's that any different than gray boxes for OGC? a gray box does not, in and of itself, say "this is OGC"--you have to look to the work's general declaration, where it says "All text in gray boxes is OGC." -- woodelf <*> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://webpages.charter.net/woodelph/ If any religion is right, maybe they all have to be right. Maybe God doesn't care how you say your prayers, just as long as you say them. --Sinclair _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
