IANAL. (Satisfied Scott?) At 10:29 AM 2/3/2002 -0800, Michael Cortez wrote: > >> But does an ALT tag, which you have to move the mouse over the > >> image to discover, clearly identify something? If you're willing > >> to take the heat of that, that's your business. But I don't see why > >> you wouldn't want to provide the text with the picture so that the > >> printed copy will display it as well. > >Oh, well, I never said I didn't want to include the caption text.
Oh, well it seemed like you did. >My problem is, the "publication" that I'm putting together is actually based >on dozens of XML files (it could be hundreds by summer) that go through a >number of automated steps to produce a set of end products -- the same >documents as HTML, PDF and MS-Help (possibly even RTF & plain TXT as well). > >The current build chain, does not allow for a Caption text to be provided >under images under all situations. Given enough time and effort, I believe >I can customize the build chain to include captions in all instances -- but >at this time, I'd rather get the document published then spend an addtional >X hours tweaking XSLT sheets and then figuring out a way of keeping those >XSLT sheets synced with new versions that a 3rd party will be putting out. But each different version is technically a different publication. The content of your source XML is not what you are distributing to anyone who buys your PDF. I wouldn't release any version that didn't have the visual indicator. It should be text on the screen which you are sure will print barring user error. Joe _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
