Note, I've changed arguments. I accept that the printed copy is no longer the original work. However...
At 09:17 AM 2/3/2002 -0800, Michael Cortez wrote: > >> >> and any artwork that has the phase 'Released as Open Game Content' > >> >> in its Caption or within the "ALT" field of the IMG tag. << > > >> And what happens when someone prints that page? > >Well, if I decided to mark images based on their HTML/XML tags, then I am >not releasing the "rendered" image, be it rendered via browser or your >printers print head. But to the license, does tucked away in an attribute flag of my XML satisfy the clear indication clause? Any reasonable person or reasonable gamer only has the rendered version to go by. >IANAL but I belive that as long as the Content is Clearly indicated when the >work is viewed via the intended method, for my meduim, then I have satisfied >the license. I'm even willing to risk receiving nasty grams about it.. But does an ALT tag, which you have to move the mouse over the image to discover, clearly identify something? If you're willing to take the heat of that, that's your business. But I don't see why you wouldn't want to provide the text with the picture so that the printed copy will display it as well. Joe _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
