Michael Cortez wrote: >The extra term they added was "...notice for each separately copyrighted >piece of open game content..." -- which implies that even if they had done >their work with only ONE entry for their module in Section 15, then when I >use two items from their work, I would have to reproduce their Section 15, >exactly, add my Copyright, AND THEN add an entry for each piece of OGL I >took. Perhaps it's just bad wording, or bad interpretation on my part. > >They also have "specifically, you must include a complete copy of the most >current version of the Open Game License from the Open Gaming Foundation." > >Which is also false, as you can use >any< copy -- and it shouldn't actually >be the one from the OGF -- it should be the one from Wizards (but that >doesn't really matter, so long as it's an official release of the OGL.) > Yeah, those would be in violation. Bad them.
DM _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
