>> OK, but what is the COPYRIGHT NOTICE other than s.15? What would it explicitely state on one sentance "the portion of this license" and then not on the other, if there wasn't the possibility of the Copyright notice coming from some other place?
>> Ok, I'm trying to work all three of these approaches out in my >> head (netbook, Clark & Mike) and I'm still not sure what works >> best. I think Mike may have an interesting idea here, but I'm >> not sure if someone re-using the material couldn't just ignore >> the individual copyright notices located with each monster and >> just use the s.15 that includes Tome of Horrors itself. They couldn't, because in my idea I've explicityly stated that the Copyright for a particular piece of OGC is contained with the OGC -- thus to satisfy #6, someone using that OGC, must use the Copyright specified with the OGC. >> I think that facilitates re-use more than either the netbook >> or Mike's approach, but I could be wrong. How is Clark's different then mine in this respect. In each case, you must place one OGL s.15 entry for each piece of OGC used (that has a diff copyright.) hmmm, I (Mike) needs to go re-read clark's original post.... -- Mike _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
