On Sunday, April 14, 2002, at 01:27 AM, Clark Peterson wrote: > As for a subsequent user having to use the "exact" > designation, I believe they are. IMHO the reason for > "exact" duplication is to protect the cited work so > that it is cited as the creator of hte work wants. I > am telling people how I want it cited.
I think the point that Mike's trying to make is that the way Section 6 is worded doesn't seem to allow for this kind of "copyright formula." I agree with you that such a think would probably match the intended spirit of the license -- and it seems that lots of projects would like to have a mechanism similar to this -- but is it technically allowed under the language used? What the license says is much closer to "copy the text that appears in Section 15" than "follow the author's instructions regarding copyright notices." Sixten _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
