Forgive me if someone has already brought this up. Since this is basically
a conversion of a prior edition rule, wouldn't the conversion policy be a
safer way to go? Sure, you probably couldn't publish something with the
complete rules and claim it as your own, but you could at least get the idea
across.
http://www.wizards.com/d20/files/ESDpolicy.rtf
Chad D. Stevens
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just my $.02 (USD) worth. Exact change only, please.
_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Subabilt... Martin L. Shoemaker
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Subabilties woodelf
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Subabilties Bryant Durrell
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Subabilties Joe Mucchiello
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Subabilties HUDarklord
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Subabilties Bryant Durrell
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Subabilties Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Subabilties Bryant Durrell
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Subabilties Martin L. Shoemaker
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Subabilties Bryant Durrell
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Subabilties Chad Stevens
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Subabilties Fraser Ronald
- [Ogf-l] d20 and Subabilties Fraser Ronald
