At 04:00 PM 1/27/03 -0800, Matthew Sprange wrote:
Well, I imagine that the issue was largely the same as with several other books of recent vintage. A number of people have pointed out that the OGC declarations in recent Mongoose books seem very vague, especially in comparison with your earlier works. To facilitate the discussion, I posted the copyright notice from Encyclopedia Arcane - Constructs:> A few weeks ago someone posted something about your Book of Ultimate > feats and they said that its designation of OGC was 'unclear'. > Would you care to comment on this?Not sure I can unless a specific point is raised.
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/pipermail/ogf-l/2003-January/002933.html
Can you comment on why you switched from your earlier method of (IMO) very clear OGC designation to the more recent "all derived material" form? I know that you've commented several times that you're very open to reuse, and I certainly appreciate that. But I do find this new OGC designation somewhat unclear -- it seems to me that the only way anyone would know what you consider to be OGC or not would be to contact you directly.
Sixten
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
