> Can you comment on why you switched from your earlier method of (IMO) very > clear OGC designation to the more recent "all derived material" form? I
I can. It is partly from flexibility and ease of production. A large part of it is also, as Mr Peterson said, a company finds a way of doing something and rarely changes. You also have to understand that we do not primarily target gamers who are specifically looking for OGC material - most don't care, and just want their big book of feats, or whatever. On the other hand, those specifically looking for OGC material are probably savvy enough to understand what makes OGC and what doesn't. > somewhat unclear -- it seems to me that the only way anyone would know what > you consider to be OGC or not would be to contact you directly. Which you are more than welcome to do. Matthew _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
