> I don't see how it's less arbitrary for Michael to invoke an > Australian ballot, or whatever this method is, than any other method we ^^^^^^^^^^ > could use to break a tie, but what the heck. HEY!!! Watchit buddy!!! :) Leathal.
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Richard Hecker
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Stephen J Baker
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Brian Paul
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Stephen J Baker
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Jon Leech
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 ... Thomas Roell
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 ... Stephen J Baker
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 ... Leath Muller
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Stephen J Baker
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Thomas Roell
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 ... Stuart Anderson
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Mark Kilgard
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Ron Bielaski
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Thomas Roell
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Stephen J Baker
