On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, Michael Gold wrote: > One caveat: If gl.h defines the extension, it will not be redefined in > glext.h. This is bad because the prototype function pointer typedef will > therefore not be defined. Yuk! Good point. > The cleanest solution IMO is that gl.h should not > define any extensions when glext.h is in use. ...Or the prototype function pointer could be left outside of the guardian ifdef in glext.h since gl.h won't define function *pointers* only the functions themselves. Steve Baker (817)619-2657 (Vox/Vox-Mail) L3Com/Link Simulation & Training (817)619-2466 (Fax) Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.hti.com Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://web2.airmail.net/sjbaker1
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 ... Leath Muller
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Stephen J Baker
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Thomas Roell
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 ... Stuart Anderson
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Mark Kilgard
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Ron Bielaski
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Thomas Roell
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Stephen J Baker
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Thomas Roell
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 ... Stephen J Baker
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES... Thomas Roell
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: ... Stephen J Baker
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote resul... Thomas Roell
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
