On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Thomas Roell wrote:
> #ifdef GL_EXT_point_parameters
> #ifdef WIN32
> pfn = wglGetProcAddress("glPointParameterfEXT");
> #else
> #ifdef GLX_ARB_get_proc_address
> pfn = glXGetProcAddressARB("glPointParameterfEXT");
> #else
> pfn = glPointParameterfEXT;
> #endif
> #endif
> #endif
I think there are some things that we can put in place to help minimize code
like this (no offense 8-)). I don't think that we can figure it out in just a
couple of days, which is why I voted for A. Let's get what we have out there,
and start getting some practical experience.
My comment to Jon was that I predict a version 1.1 in the near future becasue
despite everyones best effort, there will be something we missed. Likewise,
a coherent technique for minimizing the code changes required can also be
developed for 1.1.
What I am envisioning is a set of prototypes & defined that will allow
existing code to do the right thing, and only require a little header
file adjustments (ie include glext.h or not), and a single block of code
surrounded by the same conditional that is used to indicate the need or
absence of glext.h.
Stuart
Stuart R. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Metro Link Incorporated South Carolina Office
4711 North Powerline Road 129 Secret Cove Drive
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 Lexington, SC 29072
voice: 954.938.0283x496 voice: 803.951.3630
fax: 954.938.1982 SkyTel: 800.405.3401
http://www.metrolink.com/
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Brian Paul
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Stephen J Baker
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Jon Leech
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 ... Thomas Roell
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 ... Stephen J Baker
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 ... Leath Muller
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Stephen J Baker
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Thomas Roell
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 ... Stuart Anderson
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Mark Kilgard
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Ron Bielaski
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Thomas Roell
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Stephen J Baker
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Thomas Roell
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 ... Stephen J Baker
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES... Thomas Roell
