Hoje no Estadão saiu que os europeus "vigiam internet e telefonia como os EUA". Amanhã vai sair um escândalo parecido com o governo brasileiro, é questão de tempo. Por isso acho que como regra devemos nos ater a princípios, sem partidarizar nem cair em armadilhas nacionalistas.
Abraço, Heloisa On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Heloisa Pait <[email protected]> wrote: > Li com atenção o texto e sou favorável à assinatura. > > Prós: > 1. de modo geral concordo com o texto, que pede fiscalização sobre > surveillance sem demonizar ninguém. > 2. se a gente não assinar isso, corre o risco de ficar irrelevante no > debate > > Contra: > 3. citação da Dilma como baluarte da defesa de direitos individuais > enfraquece e politiza o texto > 4. não sei como ficou o texto final nosso, se incluimos ou não a questão > da privacidade no nosso escopo. Esse abaixo-assinado inclui questões de > transparência (nosso escopo e parte importante do abaixo-assinado) mas > também de privacidade. > > ------------------------------------ > > > We, the undersigned civil society organisations, affirm our deep > commitment to the goals of the Open Government Partnership, which in its > declaration endorsed “more transparent, accountable, responsive and > effective government” founded on the principles of the Universal > Declaration of Human Rights. > > We join other civil society organisations, human rights groups, academics > and ordinary citizens in expressing our grave concern over allegations that > governments around the world, including many OGP members, have been > routinely intercepting and retaining the private communications of entire > populations, > *in secret, without particularised warrants and with little or no > meaningful oversight.* > *CONCORDO* > Such practices allegedly include the routine exchange of “foreign” > surveillance data, bypassing domestic laws that restrict governments’ > ability to spy on their own citizens. > > Such practices erode the checks and balances on which accountability > depends, and have a deeply chilling effect on freedom of expression, > information and association, without which the ideals of open government > have no meaning. > > As Brazil’s President, Dilma Rousseff, recently said at the United > Nations, “In the absence of the right to privacy, there can be no true > freedom of expression and opinion, and therefore no effective democracy.” > (HIPOCRISIA POIS ESSE GOVERNO NÃO TEM CUIDADO COM PRIVACIDADE) > > Activities that restrict the right to privacy, including communications > surveillance, > *can only be justified when they are prescribed by law, are necessary to > achieve a legitimate aim, and are proportionate to the aim pursued.* > *CONCORDO* > [1] Without firm legislative and judicial checks on the surveillance > powers of the executive branch, and robust protections for the media and > public interest whistleblowers, abuses can and will occur. > > We call on all governments, and specifically OGP members, to: > > *recognise the need to update understandings of existing privacy and human > rights law to reflect modern surveillance technologies and techniques.* > *commit in their OGP Action Plans to complete by October 2014 a review of > national laws, with the aim of defining reforms needed to regulate > necessary, legitimate and proportional State involvement in communications > surveillance; to guarantee freedom of the press; and to protect > whistleblowers who lawfully reveal abuses of state power.* > *commit in their OGP Action Plans to transparency on the mechanisms for > surveillance, on exports of surveillance technologies, aid directed towards > implementation of surveillance technologies, and agreements to share > citizen data among states.* > *CONCORDO* > > > Abraço, > Heloisa > > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Carolina <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Talvez esse seja do escopo da OKF ? :-) >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> *From:* Renata Avila <[email protected]> >> *Date:* November 1, 2013 at 7:30:18 PM EDT >> *To:* "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> *Subject:* *[gvadvocacy] Requesting your individual, institutional >> signature and wondering if GV Advox could-should sign: Open Gov and >> Surveillance* >> *Reply-To:* Renata Avila <[email protected]> >> >> Dear all, >> >> I want to request your signature on a quite singular petition. The >> last two days, both governments and civil society met in a summit to >> discuss Open Government. The Platform is called The Open Government >> Partnership, and, while there are many debatable issues in such >> alliance, It is one of the few mechanisms with structured plans that >> the governments must follow every year: the aim is to make the govs >> more open, transparent and accountable. >> >> And during this annual meeting, the Surveillance Debate was the >> elephant in the room, the center of all debates. This petition >> basically asks govs to include the topic on their annual plans, which >> will be an opportunity to revive the issue during all the periodical >> evaluations and to push for concrete commitments from governments. >> >> While the drafting is far from perfect (It was written in a hurry) >> your name on it - or your organization name on it, will really make it >> stronger. And the request will be circulated among states. And please >> note it also includes a plea for more transparency on surveillance >> techs - the commercial ones. >> >> Here it is, including how you can join... >> >> >> http://www.webfoundation.org/2013/11/statement-of-concern-on-disproportionate-surveillance/ >> >> Have a nice weekend! >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> okfn-br mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-br >> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-br >> >> >
_______________________________________________ okfn-br mailing list [email protected] http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-br Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-br
