Vigiar telefonia é crime. Quanto à internet, me resta dúvidas:
1 - Acessar e-mail alheio é vigilância, mas;
1 - Acessar e-mail alheio é vigilância, mas;
2 - Verificar mensagens no Twitter, um lugar que o Governo brasileiro tem uma porção de contas, é imposível eles não perceberem a presença de alguém difundindo certo tipo de coisa, às vezes até para pegar mais conteúdo que lhes seja útil;
3 - Seguir IP dos outros para ver onde frequentam é crime também.
"Todas ideias claras e distintas são verdadeiras" Descartes
Hora de distinguir o que é vigilância e o que não é vigilância, se for o caso e se ocorrer confusão entre os dois conceitos: Vigilância e verificação de ideias/conteúdos úteis para ser encaminahdo no Governo.
Ps: o Twitter é uma péssima ferramenta, só cabe uma frase. Cabe a nós utilizar as ferramentas governamentais que estão disponíveis e é quase como se não existissem:
http://participatorio.juventude.gov.br/
http://psocial.sg.gov.br/
Abs
De: Heloisa Pait < [email protected] >
Enviada: Domingo, 3 de Novembro de 2013 09:17
Para: Grupo de interesse em conhecimento livre no Brasil, especialmente dados abertos < [email protected] >
Assunto: Re: [okfn-br] Fwd: [gvadvocacy] Requesting your individual, institutional signature and wondering if GV Advox could-should sign: Open Gov and Surveillance
Hoje no Estadão saiu que os europeus "vigiam internet e telefonia como os EUA". Amanhã vai sair um escândalo parecido com o governo brasileiro, é questão de tempo. Por isso acho que como regra devemos nos ater a princípios, sem partidarizar nem cair em armadilhas nacionalistas.
Abraço,
Heloisa
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Heloisa Pait <[email protected]> wrote:
Li com atenção o texto e sou favorável à assinatura.Prós:1. de modo geral concordo com o texto, que pede fiscalização sobre surveillance sem demonizar ninguém.2. se a gente não assinar isso, corre o risco de ficar irrelevante no debateContra:3. citação da Dilma como baluarte da defesa de direitos individuais enfraquece e politiza o texto4. não sei como ficou o texto final nosso, se incluimos ou não a questão da privacidade no nosso escopo. Esse abaixo-assinado inclui questões de transparência (nosso escopo e parte importante do abaixo-assinado) mas também de privacidade.------------------------------------We, the undersigned civil society organisations, affirm our deep commitment to the goals of the Open Government Partnership, which in its declaration endorsed “more transparent, accountable, responsive and effective government” founded on the principles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.We join other civil society organisations, human rights groups, academics and ordinary citizens in expressing our grave concern over allegations that governments around the world, including many OGP members, have been routinely intercepting and retaining the private communications of entire populations,in secret, without particularised warrants and with little or no meaningful oversight.CONCORDOSuch practices allegedly include the routine exchange of “foreign” surveillance data, bypassing domestic laws that restrict governments’ ability to spy on their own citizens.Such practices erode the checks and balances on which accountability depends, and have a deeply chilling effect on freedom of _expression_, information and association, without which the ideals of open government have no meaning.As Brazil’s President, Dilma Rousseff, recently said at the United Nations, “In the absence of the right to privacy, there can be no true freedom of _expression_ and opinion, and therefore no effective democracy.” (HIPOCRISIA POIS ESSE GOVERNO NÃO TEM CUIDADO COM PRIVACIDADE)Activities that restrict the right to privacy, including communications surveillance,can only be justified when they are prescribed by law, are necessary to achieve a legitimate aim, and are proportionate to the aim pursued.CONCORDO[1] Without firm legislative and judicial checks on the surveillance powers of the executive branch, and robust protections for the media and public interest whistleblowers, abuses can and will occur.We call on all governments, and specifically OGP members, to:recognise the need to update understandings of existing privacy and human rights law to reflect modern surveillance technologies and techniques.commit in their OGP Action Plans to complete by October 2014 a review of national laws, with the aim of defining reforms needed to regulate necessary, legitimate and proportional State involvement in communications surveillance; to guarantee freedom of the press; and to protect whistleblowers who lawfully reveal abuses of state power.commit in their OGP Action Plans to transparency on the mechanisms for surveillance, on exports of surveillance technologies, aid directed towards implementation of surveillance technologies, and agreements to share citizen data among states.CONCORDO
Abraço,Heloisa
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Carolina <[email protected]> wrote:_______________________________________________Talvez esse seja do escopo da OKF ? :-)
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:From: Renata Avila <[email protected]>
Date: November 1, 2013 at 7:30:18 PM EDT
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [gvadvocacy] Requesting your individual, institutional signature and wondering if GV Advox could-should sign: Open Gov and Surveillance
Reply-To: Renata Avila <[email protected]>
Dear all,
I want to request your signature on a quite singular petition. The
last two days, both governments and civil society met in a summit to
discuss Open Government. The Platform is called The Open Government
Partnership, and, while there are many debatable issues in such
alliance, It is one of the few mechanisms with structured plans that
the governments must follow every year: the aim is to make the govs
more open, transparent and accountable.
And during this annual meeting, the Surveillance Debate was the
elephant in the room, the center of all debates. This petition
basically asks govs to include the topic on their annual plans, which
will be an opportunity to revive the issue during all the periodical
evaluations and to push fo r concrete commitments from governments.
While the drafting is far from perfect (It was written in a hurry)
your name on it - or your organization name on it, will really make it
stronger. And the request will be circulated among states. And please
note it also includes a plea for more transparency on surveillance
techs - the commercial ones.
Here it is, including how you can join...
http://www.webfoundation.org/2013/11/statement-of-concern-on-disproportionate-surveillance/
Have a nice weekend!
okfn-br mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-br
Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-br
_______________________________________________ okfn-br mailing list [email protected] http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-br Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-br
