Milton,

That story just about brought tears to my eyes!


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Infinite Space Systems, Inc." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 2:00 AM
Subject: Re: What makes a Oldsmobile a Oldsmobile? Your thoughts?


> David,
>
> For me, it's the '64 Olds F-85 A-body, and to a slightly lesser extent,
the
> '65 Olds F-85 A-body.
>
> In mid-September, 1963, a few days after my 17th birthday (born 4 Sept.
> '46), my Dad took me to the national new car announcement show for
> Oldsmobile, held that year in Kansas City, Missouri. 1964 was the first
year
> for GM's new intermediate size automobile. When I first laid eyes on the
> 1964 Olds F-85 upon the theater's stage, I immediately fell in love with
> that particular body style. When the 442 came out for 1964½, I had to have
> one.
> During the Thanksgiving break in my senior year in college during the Fall
> of 1968, I found one. My maternal grandmother lived in Independence. We
> always had Thanksgiving evening dinner with her. After dinner, I drove
over
> to Ketchum Olds on 40 Highway to check the used car lot. Sitting in the
back
> was a black 1964 442. It was too dark to tell anything about her.
>
> Early on Friday morning, I called Ketchum's used car department. They said
> the car had just come in on a trade and hadn't been cleaned up yet. I
asked
> how much they wanted "as is." The reply - $800.00. I told them don't touch
> it, and I was leaving now. I stopped by the bank and was at Ketchum 30
> minutes later. The car was a Cutlass 2-door coupe with the 442 option
> (police pursuit 320 hp, 330 cube engine, 4-on-the-floor, dual exhaust). It
> had 113,000 miles on it. The front end had been wiped out in the near
past,
> because both front fenders and the hood were new. There was a huge bondo
> patch in the lower right rear fender. The interior was well used. I loved
> her.
>
> In the Spring of 1971, she first hit the streets with a new life and 482
> cubes of might. By the Spring of 1975, with her third engine (468), second
> rear axle housing, and fourth suspension system, she was in her basic
final
> configuration. Only minor changes have been made since 1975. I will own
her
> forever. She is Thunder Lizard.
>
> Milton Schick
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 1964 442 Cutlass, AKA Thunder Lizard, or just Thunder for short
> 1964 Cutlass
> 1965 F-85 4-door
> 1965 Vista Cruiser
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "David Manly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 8:16 PM
> Subject: What makes a Oldsmobile a Oldsmobile? Your thoughts?
>
>
> What makes a Oldsmobile a Oldsmobile? (or a Oldsmobile owner a Oldsmobile
> owner and not a "GM" owner?)
>
>
>
> This is something that I have been pondering for some time now as I have
> read various posts not only here, but also in other web areas and sites. I
> am not trying to start any kind of a war, but I would really be interested
> in your honest thoughts on the following thoughts; Maybe just to get
others
> thinking about the bigger picture?!?
>
>
>
> There are several different crowds that flock to various years and types
of
> Oldsmobile's that I have noticed, and some/most view with respect other's
> choices, but there are a few that are very polarized as to there exact
model
> and choice, almost to the extent that they consider all other Oldsmobile's
> as non-Olds! Have you run into any of the following - and is it justified?
>
>
>
> #1 The curved dash owners, to them, seems that this was and is the last
real
> Olds ever made.
>
>
>
> #2 Pre WWII owners, GM didn't produce a Olds after the war it seems.
>
>
>
> #3 The fifties owners, people like me who like the idea of a super 88, or
a
> chrome laden 98. Wear the sunshades!
>
>
>
> #4 The sixties muscle car people, if it doesn't have a V-8 or 4-spd, it
> isn't a Olds! Good to go straight ahead... and fast!
>
>
>
> #5 The seventies, last of the truly full size Olds, last of the land
yachts!
> If it isn't big, it isn't an Olds!
>
>
>
> #6 Last of the Olds V-8's, you know those few hang on A/G/B bodies in the
> eighties. They may be slower than some of the older Olds V-8's, but you
have
> to give them credit for sticking with a Quadrajet until the very end!
>
>
>
> #7 Last of the Olds, the FWD's, with all of their technical wizardry. You
> know these, maligned by many as "plastic" cars, but it seems that these
very
> same people hold the Oldsmobile name up as the "technical" leader of GM..
> Hmmm, I wonder why that would not apply to these cars also?
>
>
>
> #8 The Quad four owners, see the note on Oldsmobile technical leadership
> above!
>
>
>
> And I should add.
>
>
>
> #9 The Oldsmobile diesel lovers. Nice engines, wish the plug had not been
> pulled so soon. They were just getting past the bugs!
>
>
>
> #10 Those who don't care for the last Olds emblem, for us it will be
> Rocket's forever, although the new emblem in no way makes those last few
> warriors to the Olds name any less of a Oldsmobile!
>
>
>
> Now that you have taken the time to read thru this, feel free to express
> your thoughts as to my ramblings....
>
>
>
> David
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.0/276 - Release Date: 3/7/2006
>

Reply via email to