With that in mind, could you imagine a 4wd 442. Audi leads the way in AWD They were banned in some sanctioned races. Because they were glued to the track. I can say they are fun to drive from experience ron
rodney fama OCA #033098 1969 cutlass s 1969 442 north carolinia car 1969 442 cali car. assembly required stay away from www.calicars.cc what a hassle. 1972 cutlass convertable 1976 phx y-76 arizona regional car. assy. required 1977 cutlass supreme (3) 1986 honda shadow vt 1100c cruiser 1987 cutlass supreme 1989 chevy k-2500 4*4 pick up 1991 yamaha warrior atv 1994 chevy caprice 9c-1 police pkg 732-986-6388 cell 732-254-9500 wk 2 pm best time to call week days web site. shows disc brake conversion using 79 trans am rear disc on my 77 cutlass,and my 77 restoration project, along with other toys http://home.comcast.net/~77w30442/wsb/html/view.cgi-contact.html-.html http://home.comcast.net/~77w30442/wsb/html/view.cgi-photos.html-MerchantID-2 21197-Publish-t-makestatic-true-skip-45.html you may have to copy and paste the address to web browser. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Manly Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 2:50 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: 442 Achieva Wow.. I am going to take a totally different thought on this. I believe in AWD systems. Makes rear wheel drive AND fwd suck at both traction and handling. Guess that is why they outlawed the McLaren AWD car way back in the 60's. Personally a rear wheel drive sitting there spinning the rear wheels is no more impressive that a fwd drive spinning it's front wheels. <yawn> But light up all four.. there ya go! My two cents... David ----- Original Message ----- From: "77w30" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 9:59 PM Subject: RE: 442 Achieva > By you're own definition's of a muscle car. > A Toyota Camry would be a muscle car. It will kick the crap out of the > front > wheel drive 442 in qtr mile and mpg. Plus last longer. > Any way we can beat this to death. > REAR WHEEL DRIVE, ENGINE THAT KICKS BUT, GOOD LOOKING, AMERICAN MADE. NOT > ASSEMBLED IN THE USA BUT ACTUALLY BUILT NOT STAMPED OUT. HANDLES GOOD. > TURNS HEAD WITH ENVY AND NOT ARE YOU KIDDING ME A FRONT WHEEL DRIVE 442, > HOLLY CRAP WITH A 4 BANGER. FIRM SHIFTING TRANS THAT CHIRPS THE REAR TIRES > NOT YOURE STEERING TIRES. WHICH IS UNSAFE UN LIKE REAR WHEEL DRIVE. YOU > DON'T HAVE TO ASK WHY. FRONT WHEEL CHIRPS CAN CAUSE LOSS OF STEERING OR > PULL DO TO TORQUE STEER. IF ROADWAY IS WET YOU CAN BREAK TRACTION AND > SLIDE > OFF THE ROAD BECAUSE YOU CANT STEER THE CAR. > WHERE IF REAR WHEEL DRIVE CAR BREAKS TRACTION YOU CAN STEER OUT OF IT AND > SAY DAM THAT WAS FUN. > ALSO A MUSCLE CAR MUST HAVE A NICE SOUNDING REVING ENGINE. CAN NOT SOUND > LIKE OLD MAN FARTING. ITS JUST WRONG. > SO TO EACH HIS OWN, > THAT'S MY FEELING ABOUT THIS. > TAKE CARE > RON > > > rodney fama OCA #033098 > 1969 cutlass s > 1969 442 north carolinia car > 1969 442 cali car. assembly required stay away from www.calicars.cc what > a > hassle. > 1972 cutlass convertable > 1976 phx y-76 arizona regional car. assy. required > 1977 cutlass supreme (3) > 1986 honda shadow vt 1100c cruiser > 1987 cutlass supreme > 1989 chevy k-2500 4*4 pick up > 1991 yamaha warrior atv > 1994 chevy caprice 9c-1 police pkg > 732-986-6388 cell > 732-254-9500 wk 2 pm best time to call week days > web site. shows disc brake conversion using 79 trans am rear disc on my 77 > cutlass,and my 77 restoration project, along with other toys > > http://home.comcast.net/~77w30442/wsb/html/view.cgi-contact.html-.html > > http://home.comcast.net/~77w30442/wsb/html/view.cgi-photos.html-MerchantID-2 > 21197-Publish-t-makestatic-true-skip-45.html > > you may have to copy and paste the address to web browser. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 12:07 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: 442 Achieva > > That site never even mentions performance numbers. But > it can't be a muscle car if it costs too much? Sorry, they > already picked out their exclusive favored models, and > blackballed everyone else regardless of performance. > > Bruce (numbers tell the story) Roe > > 5 Jun 2006 "Infinite Space Systems, Inc." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> For a good, consise, defintion of what a muscle car is, by vehicle >> model and >> make, go here: >> >> > http://www.musclecarclub.com/musclecars/general/musclecars-definition.sht > ml >> >> There may be a few surprises. >> >> Milton Schick > >
