No, it's quite simple actually...it's a native virtualization driver. What's a little bit hard to get working sometimes is the virt-manager and libvirtd stuff (user space stuff that helps to manage KVM machines on user space). Currently this libs seems to be working fine but we had some issues on last RC's iso's befora GA release, maybe it'd be good a good testing on this side.
What do you think? On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 08:12:20PM +0200, Blackcrack wrote: > Kvm, it is not named??: > Kernel Virtual Mashin/engine ? > > should be not an big thing to add it in the kernel .. it's an helper > for qemu and other VM's > i has play around since mdk 6.1 / 7.X who comes qemu and has need > the kvm in the kernel as module, > but i has load it directly in the kernel.. was nromally not an big > thing.. shold be include in the kernel Nicco ? > should be easy to selecting it.. so as I still know of the time .. > > best regards > Blacky > > Am 14.05.2014 18:06, schrieb Denis Silakov: > >On 14.05.2014 19:27, Nicolò Costanza wrote: > >>Indeed! > >> > >>KVM support would be fine e too... > >> > >Hm, is smth special required for KVM? ROSA autotests ( > >http://fba.rosalinux.ru/autotest/) are launched every night in > >qemu/kvm and seems to perform good without any additional drivers > >(to be sure, you can consider smth like virtio, but I guess for > >many users this is not so important) > > > > > > >
