NO, These are for vmware products, for ex. vmplayer
if in iso, perhaps should work as guest addictions Il Mercoledì 14 Maggio 2014 13:28, Colin Close <[email protected]> ha scritto: Nicco, Are you saying that open-vm-tools performs better than Vbox? I've never used it but if it's a good alternative I might use it for Qa since Vbox has trouble with video on boot. Best Colin On Wednesday 14 May 2014 10:26:11 Nicolò Costanza wrote: > yes, indeed! > > > I agree too with the "blacky" point of view > > > for this reason then we should add also vmware-tools on iso, > to be full compliant with the free vmware player virtualizer... > > http://open-vm-tools.sourceforge.net/ > > > > > bye, NicCo > - > > > Il Mercoledì 14 Maggio 2014 11:14, Raphaël Jadot <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > Hi, > > I agree with both of you, in fact one vision is more developer centric, and > the other user centric, but IMHO both are correct, and we can't ignore that > Vbox is a simple way to test and be convinced by OM Lx. > > What does "voit" means? > > > > > 2014-05-14 7:51 GMT+02:00 Blackcrack <[email protected]>: > > Hi Nicco :) > > >maybe it's an VBox an dump and stupid testcenario, but it's for the > > user > > >the easiest possible /cenario who it's possible for fast and easy > > testing an an actual OS.. > > >it's clear, to be not the best technical/tactical possible for view, > > how it's run, > > >and how fast it is, but for the normal user an through out usable > > medium, that he also used .. > > >at first to be see, whether it is also usable for it, this, dont > > forget.. > > >and the mass it is easy the normal User, the 2.nd it is the > > Technical Peoples > > >and at last also the programmers .. > >but all around mus it works, in real Hardware and in VBox.. you see > > > :) > > > >it's maybe the badest hardcore worst scenario for you as kernel > > Builder, but.. > > >buddy, i know, you can do it ;) *bg* > > > >how ever, the Users .. no, the most users test it in an vm at first, > > then on real hardware > > >if works for they are.. you see, this is why VBOX mus be include in > > the test, > > >to works well also in vbox, to be the peoples to be works also well > > for they are .. > > >to be they are able for see, to be the best system for they are and > > they are see, > > >he dont mus trust only, they are can know it.. to be the best for > > they are.. > > >with test before in an vm.. and don't need an pure trust in "voit" > > words ;) > > >best regards > >Blacky > > > > > >Am 14.05.2014 07:22, schrieb Nicolò Costanza: > > > >Hi > > > >>One review >>> > >> > >>http://frederic.bezies.free.fr/blog/?p=11135#more-11135 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>Considerations (perhaps this text. or with a few small modification, can > >>be used for our wiki) > >> > >> > >>Trying an OS with VBox must be considered enough to see the graphic theme > >>and the disposal of the menu and the programs inside, none can be said > >>about the OS guest responsiveness and reactiveness!!! > >> > >> > >> > >>When people install, test and review only in Virtualbox then pretending to > >>judge speed of the virtualized OS only from that virtual environment is > >>like being a useless and stupid test: > >> > >> > >> > >>a> if a fast and responsive OS like OM Lx 2014 is hosting many OS running > >>as guests, for example like in our Demo showed at Linux Tag, all guest > >>OSes can be running blazing fast or at least as native, and sometimes > >>they can work also faster than natively... > >> > >> > >> > >>b> on the contrary if a slow Host OS as Ubuntu or Mageia start running a > >>very fast and responsive OS like OM Lx 2014 in guest mode, it's > >>absolutely impossible for the virtualized OS to show its real capacity > >>and responsiveness as this behaviour is depending for the most part from > >>the Host inner capacity... > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>bye, NicCo > >>-
