2014-09-06 6:53 GMT+02:00 [email protected] < [email protected]>:
> > Il 05/09/2014 21:59, Raphaël Jadot ha scritto: > > Not every one were in my last email recipients, so I write this part again: > > >>> Maybe we could show that we have some focus, and make some proposals > around Qt? > > * Rewrite some OMCC tools in Qt > * Or rewrite new tools such as: > ** Connecting in few click a Linux Computer to a Windows domain > ** Easily share/mount folders with several protocols (nfs and cifs as > usual, but also webdav/davfs2, sshfs, etc) > * Improve Accessibility layer in KDE which is very poor compared to GNOME > > > > Some ideas not coming from me > * Intelligent configuration/reinitialisation wizard (from user survey > 2013) > * Intelligent debug wizard (user survey 2013) > * Application Store/Software center > * Add an interactive "i like/dislike this part of UI" (hard to explain, > Idea from Colin, maybe would do better than me :) > * Make a remaster tool (OnlyHuman) > > > > 2014-09-05 18:17 GMT+02:00 Raphaël Jadot <[email protected]>: > >> http://semesterofcode.com/ we are cited in the landing page... >> >> >> 2014-09-05 18:04 GMT+02:00 Kate Lebedeff <[email protected]>: >> >>> Dear all >>> >>> We had some talks about the development ideas, and thought that we >>> could suggest to semester of code not only what was before, but also new >>> things. >>> >>> It also could be the ideas, which we preliminary discussed for >>> kickstarter. >>> >>> We have only few days to submit the ideas - and this takes from the >>> author only some minutes to summarize the idea into 1-2 paragraphs!! >>> >>> Please submit your ideas as reply to this email or by the link below. >>> >>> Thanks a lot!! >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 2Sep, 2014, at 4:40 PM, Kate Lebedeff wrote: >>> >>> Dear all >>> >>> Google runs another project, which could attract new contributors to >>> OMA (inform much more students about our existence) >>> Description is here: http://semesterofcode.com/ >>> >>> Our application to GsOC earlier this year was declined ONLY because we >>> had too few words about each project. >>> Ideas were collected here: https://wiki.openmandriva.org/en/GSoC >>> So to win - we have to make the descriptions much more detailed. >>> >>> Dear Cookers, what would be your ideas for the project? >>> Can you please take them down ,describing quite detailed? (though, I >>> believe 2-3 good informative paragraphs per project should be enough) >>> >>> Our deadline is 12th September, so we should have gathered ideas by >>> next TC I guess, where to discuss them, polish and send. >>> >>> Will you please send descriptions of your ideas as reply to this >>> email, or, if more convenient, here: >>> >>> >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HMTz_c4wMbFiDyy8D9LJfx2wysNO6PmMKxWFghwH7VQ/edit?usp=sharing >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Kate >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > OM-Cooker mailing > [email protected]http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org > > Maybe for testing and development purposes, we could use a TTY ISO, > if we don't have a CLI installer, then a live usb-ISO would be nice, afics > to build a iso is not very laborious , so why not? > The people shouldn't be scared by a TTY it could be real fun , > this could show that CLI and TTY is not a geek thing . > Some nice tty 's: > > http://wiki.mandrivausers.ro/_media/mandriva/ghid-2011/rosa.png?w=1024&tok=934683 > > http://wiki.mandrivausers.ro/_media/mandriva/ghid/mplayer-moc.png?w=1024&tok=0dcddb > > http://wiki.mandrivausers.ro/_media/mandriva/ghid/dvtm_mc_centerim_htop.png?w=1024&tok=81063b > > Maybe trying something different that all the distros are offering is not > such a bad idea. > > Absolutely agree, and furthermore, it can be a good base for a remaster tool.
_______________________________________________ OM-Cooker mailing list [email protected] http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
