Hi, i'd like to mention that in our project.openmandriva.org is good place to get some information.
Imho main goals: 1. Instaler a. written in Qt5 b. should work in CLI mode c. should allow to configure partitions, lvm, RAIDS, etc. d. support for EFI e. support for multiple squashfs(other fs) images to install 2. Support OMV in zypper a. adapt Openmandriva to zypper b. add support for hdlists read/generate c. more to come. Without above two cruical point, OpenMandriva Lx as a distribution will not go further in any distant journey. Simply these so importan that blocks development. Other are not so important, as drakx is mostly not used at all for configuration, like 90% of stuff can be done from KDE. 2014-09-08 8:12 GMT+02:00 Denis Silakov <[email protected]>: > I'd like to add an idea concerning some kind of modularity in our > installer (maybe rewriting the whole installer from scratch would be nicer, > but I doubt that this can be quickly done by a student). > > I will add the a more detailed task description to wiki or OpenProject a > little later. > > > On 09/08/2014 03:02 AM, Raphaël Jadot wrote: > > Symbianflo, sorry I missed the reply: well it seems that we don't had > CLI installer, we only had CLI iso. > > We have at this moment these proposals: > > * CLI installer by Symbianflo > * Remaster tool by Onlyhuman > * Accessibility in KDE 4 or Plasma next ( > http://blogs.fsfe.org/gladhorn/2014/07/07/plasma-next-accessibility/ ) > * Wizard for configuration > * others? > > Deadline is 12th september, people are watching us ( > http://semesterofcode.com/ : "Organisations that Semester of Code > students will have the opportunity to work with include the NASA Jet > Propulsion Laboratory, Moodle, OpenMandriva and Lime Survey."). Which do > you prefer? > > 2014-09-06 13:47 GMT+02:00 [email protected] < > [email protected]>: > >> >> Il 06/09/2014 12:51, Raphaël Jadot ha scritto: >> >> >> >> >> 2014-09-06 6:53 GMT+02:00 [email protected] < >> [email protected]>: >> >>> >>> Il 05/09/2014 21:59, Raphaël Jadot ha scritto: >>> >>> Not every one were in my last email recipients, so I write this part >>> again: >>> >>> >>>>> Maybe we could show that we have some focus, and make some >>> proposals around Qt? >>> >>> * Rewrite some OMCC tools in Qt >>> * Or rewrite new tools such as: >>> ** Connecting in few click a Linux Computer to a Windows domain >>> ** Easily share/mount folders with several protocols (nfs and cifs as >>> usual, but also webdav/davfs2, sshfs, etc) >>> * Improve Accessibility layer in KDE which is very poor compared to >>> GNOME >>> >>> >>> >>> Some ideas not coming from me >>> * Intelligent configuration/reinitialisation wizard (from user survey >>> 2013) >>> * Intelligent debug wizard (user survey 2013) >>> * Application Store/Software center >>> * Add an interactive "i like/dislike this part of UI" (hard to >>> explain, Idea from Colin, maybe would do better than me :) >>> * Make a remaster tool (OnlyHuman) >>> >>> >>> >>> 2014-09-05 18:17 GMT+02:00 Raphaël Jadot <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> http://semesterofcode.com/ we are cited in the landing page... >>>> >>>> >>>> 2014-09-05 18:04 GMT+02:00 Kate Lebedeff <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> Dear all >>>>> >>>>> We had some talks about the development ideas, and thought that we >>>>> could suggest to semester of code not only what was before, but also new >>>>> things. >>>>> >>>>> It also could be the ideas, which we preliminary discussed for >>>>> kickstarter. >>>>> >>>>> We have only few days to submit the ideas - and this takes from the >>>>> author only some minutes to summarize the idea into 1-2 paragraphs!! >>>>> >>>>> Please submit your ideas as reply to this email or by the link below. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks a lot!! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 2Sep, 2014, at 4:40 PM, Kate Lebedeff wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Dear all >>>>> >>>>> Google runs another project, which could attract new contributors to >>>>> OMA (inform much more students about our existence) >>>>> Description is here: http://semesterofcode.com/ >>>>> >>>>> Our application to GsOC earlier this year was declined ONLY because >>>>> we had too few words about each project. >>>>> Ideas were collected here: https://wiki.openmandriva.org/en/GSoC >>>>> So to win - we have to make the descriptions much more detailed. >>>>> >>>>> Dear Cookers, what would be your ideas for the project? >>>>> Can you please take them down ,describing quite detailed? (though, I >>>>> believe 2-3 good informative paragraphs per project should be enough) >>>>> >>>>> Our deadline is 12th September, so we should have gathered ideas by >>>>> next TC I guess, where to discuss them, polish and send. >>>>> >>>>> Will you please send descriptions of your ideas as reply to this >>>>> email, or, if more convenient, here: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HMTz_c4wMbFiDyy8D9LJfx2wysNO6PmMKxWFghwH7VQ/edit?usp=sharing >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> >>>>> Kate >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OM-Cooker mailing >>> [email protected]http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org >>> >>> Maybe for testing and development purposes, we could use a TTY ISO, >>> if we don't have a CLI installer, then a live usb-ISO would be nice, >>> afics >>> to build a iso is not very laborious , so why not? >>> The people shouldn't be scared by a TTY it could be real fun , >>> this could show that CLI and TTY is not a geek thing . >>> Some nice tty 's: >>> >>> http://wiki.mandrivausers.ro/_media/mandriva/ghid-2011/rosa.png?w=1024&tok=934683 >>> >>> http://wiki.mandrivausers.ro/_media/mandriva/ghid/mplayer-moc.png?w=1024&tok=0dcddb >>> >>> http://wiki.mandrivausers.ro/_media/mandriva/ghid/dvtm_mc_centerim_htop.png?w=1024&tok=81063b >>> >>> Maybe trying something different that all the distros are offering is >>> not such a bad idea. >>> >>> Absolutely agree, and furthermore, it can be a good base for a >> remaster tool. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OM-Cooker mailing >> [email protected]http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org >> >> Hmmm Ash , that's tricky , because we don't have a CLI installer, ( or >> we do?, then excuse me...) >> It is true , a minimal with only CLI in TTY is by far, more easy to >> handle, for remastering and/or branding. >> Anyway , I'll see what is missing in OMA regarding CLI && TTY and sync >> with MRB, just in case we'll need it. >> >> -- >> Greetings >> >> ___________________ >> >> MRB ain't no shit >> >> Rosalinux.Ro >> >> Mandrivausers.Ro >> ________________ >> >> Talk is cheap, show me the code. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OM-Cooker mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > OM-Cooker mailing > [email protected]http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org > > > > -- > Denis Silakov, ROSA Laboratory.www.rosalab.ru > > > _______________________________________________ > OM-Cooker mailing list > [email protected] > http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org >
_______________________________________________ OM-Cooker mailing list [email protected] http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
