On 29 January 2015 at 15:08:24, rugyada ([email protected]) wrote: > Hello, > > 2015-01-29 20:04 GMT+01:00 Ben Bullard : > > [..] > > I'm going to try some more testing/dithering before voting myself but I > > would be more comfortable if this release wasn't labeled Alpha but something > > like Pre-Alpha or Tech Preview in order to get it out there publicly and > > hopefully get more people to help us solve problems. That may also make it > > easier to explain to Linux public at large why we're releasing without KDE > > desktop. > > > > I'd suggest Raw Draft release. > > New LXQt is more a temporary desktop, awaiting for KF5, so there's > nothing really new which will be featured in final release. > Sadly enough, also LXQt is not working at the best; rpmdrake is not > working, nor some other tools (please see bugzilla reports) >
Hearing everyone's arguments for this, I think calling it Pre-Alpha or Tech Preview or Raw Draft, whatever you'd like to name it, is probably better than Alpha at this stage, and could justify it better at FOSDEM. Cooker people, thoughts? It would be easier also to use this to promote the tools used to build this release. -- cheers, Robert :: github.com/robxu9 _______________________________________________ OM-Cooker mailing list [email protected] http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
