Personally, I think it's good enough for a go this round, as long as we emphasize that a KDE5 Alpha will come soon.
Not everything has to work. We still have to flesh out the barriers between alpha/beta/rc, and we're just getting to the point where we can safely determine what constitutes what based on manpower. But your thoughts? Note that once things start working, they shouldn't regress. UEFI wasn't working before, so it's reasonable to have it still malfunctioning this round. On 29 Jan 2015 20:22, "Ben Bullard" <[email protected]> wrote: > Was there a Go/Nogo determination? If so I missed it. > > Ben Bullard > ben79 > -------------------- > OpenMandriva-QA Team > > > On 01/29/2015 06:07 PM, Tomasz Gajc wrote: > > As you may not have follow TC meetings we decided to go with LXQt with > alpha, because kde4 is well known and it would give bad impressions that we > are lazy, second KF5 is not yet ready even as alpha, other desktops based > on wayland are way to experimental. > > LXQt alpha was about to show off great work done on clang switch, but now > this is lost. > > I asked it few times to create some basic QA procedure for testing ISO, > upgrade from previous releases done weekly, and it never fleshed out. > Mostly this looks like some kind of rush because I have to ping on ML about > to test iso and get some feedback. Robert I suggest to you to start working > on QA procedure of testing, because current situation is highly > unprofessional. > > My frustration has nothing to do here, because I used to this over last 3 > three releases. What really concerns me is that we on Fosdem will have > noting to offer to visitors. > > What I should say to visitors who will notice our banner that we are 100% > clang, and they asked for iso? > There are no usb sticks to give away, so idea was to give QR code to > sf.net alpha release. > > Speaking of manpower, I bet you have friends who are interested in Linux, > ask them maybe this will help to get new people on board. > > Wysłano z Samsung Grand Neo Orange Polska > > > _______________________________________________ > OM-Cooker mailing > [email protected]http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > OM-Cooker mailing list > [email protected] > http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org >
_______________________________________________ OM-Cooker mailing list [email protected] http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
