Just as an FYI - just learned that a major resource manager vendor will be utilizing PRRTE as their runtime for executing applications. So a significant percentage of HPC systems are going to need a PRRTE package, hopefully distributed by someone from the distro community.
Ralph > On Apr 27, 2020, at 12:48 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) via ompi-packagers > <email@example.com> wrote: > > Open MPI packagers -- > > Just to be clear: this is an open question to you for the upcoming Open MPI > v5.0.x series. > > We'd really appreciate your feedback. > > Thanks! > > > >> On Apr 14, 2020, at 12:40 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote: >> >> <poke> Just pinging you all to ensure you got this. I need to know if we >> need to coordinate an official PRRTE release to coincide (and sync) with the >> release of OMPI v5.0, or if you are okay with just using the embedded PRRTE >> included with the OMPI v5.0 tarball. >> >> If it helps, PRRTE depends upon hwloc, libevent, and PMIx - none of which >> are internally embedded. >> >> Thanks >> Ralph >> >> >>> On Apr 1, 2020, at 8:40 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi folks >>> >>> I just wanted to alert you to the fact that we are replacing the ORTE >>> runtime environment in Open MPI with an external package called PRRTE >>> ("PMIx Reference RunTime Environment"). We will be including a copy of that >>> package in the OMPI v5 tarball, just as we do libevent, hwloc, and PMIx. >>> >>> PRRTE historically has not been generating official releases - there is an >>> old v1.0, but nothing on a regular release sequence. As part of this change >>> in OMPI, the PRRTE folks will begin generating official releases that OMPI >>> will use in their releases. So there will be correlation between the >>> packages. >>> >>> My question to you is: is this a package you would prefer to distribute >>> separately (as you do for PMIx and friends), or shall we just leave it as >>> an included package? PRRTE does get used by a fairly small community of >>> people at the national labs and a couple of universities, but it by no >>> means has as wide-ranging a following as OMPI. >>> >>> Just need to know if we need to add a --with-prrte option to OMPI's >>> configure code so one could point it at an external PRRTE installation. >>> Ralph >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ompi-packagers mailing list >>> firstname.lastname@example.org >>> https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/ompi-packagers >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ompi-packagers mailing list >> email@example.com >> https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/ompi-packagers > > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquy...@cisco.com > > _______________________________________________ > ompi-packagers mailing list > firstname.lastname@example.org > https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/ompi-packagers _______________________________________________ ompi-packagers mailing list email@example.com https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/ompi-packagers