For the record, Marketing had two concerns with Cities: 1) OpenStack also uses some cities, so we would need to ensure that our names do not overlap with theirs.
2) Visual elements (for launch banners and other branding assets) - many cities look like other big cities. We would want to ensure that each city picked has a widely recognized landmark to anchor on. Obviously both of these are very manageable, just things to be aware of. Regards, Lisa On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 3:17 AM, Phil Robb <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello All: > > The Release Naming Framework election has concluded and the winner is > "Global Cities". > Result detailsHide details > 12345 > 1. Global Cities - 106 117 130 147 > 2. Scientists 99 - 111 131 132 > 3. Music Composers 87 82 - 108 131 > 4. Philosophers 74 51 81 - 116 > 5. Zodiac Signs 55 62 63 73 - > > > Before we make it official, we need to run the idea by the Marketing Folks > to make sure they have no issues with it. > > I'll keep you posted. > > Thanks to all of those folks that voted. We had 210 votes all told. > > Best, > > Phil. > -- > Phil Robb > Executive Director, OpenDaylight Project > VP Operations - Networking & Orchestration, The Linux Foundation > (O) 970-229-5949 <(970)%20229-5949> > (M) 970-420-4292 <(970)%20420-4292> > Skype: Phil.Robb > > _______________________________________________ > ONAP-TSC mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc > > -- *Lisa Caywood* Director of Ecosystem Development | OpenDaylight Project | [email protected] | +1 408 857 3642
_______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
