So I had already done a search for "Amsterdam" earlier, and for "Anchorage" this morning.
Both appear to be free of conflict, eg not appearing in trademarked tech product names. Amsterdam is a bit more visually distinctive than Anchorage (to the 2nd point of marketing considerations). The TSC can move forward on determining which it prefers. We (Marketing) can also review all of the alternatives in Gildas' list for subsequent releases if desired, and make recommendations from there, if desired. Thanks, Lisa On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Alla Goldner <alla.gold...@amdocs.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > > > I believe we voted for the “Global Cities” in general, but not for the > specific cities in the list. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > *Alla Goldner* > > > > Open Network Division > > Amdocs Technology > > > > > > > > *From:* onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-bounces@ > lists.onap.org] *On Behalf Of *HU, BIN > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 14, 2017 9:34 PM > *To:* Lisa Caywood <lcayw...@opendaylight.org> > *Cc:* onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc <onap-...@lists.onap.org> > *Subject:* Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] ONAP Release Naming Framework > Election Has Concluded - Global Cities Wins > > > > The official record of proposal in onap-tsc mailing list is > https://lists.onap.org/pipermail/onap-tsc/2017-May/000598.html > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_pipermail_onap-2Dtsc_2017-2DMay_000598.html&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6qPcDOqMgwf1K_r6YIIHhw&m=8Y1ubWphVMveg3lm64SS2irGIApN6wCbDYZxjk5Cc4g&s=gdIFXcHegxW9MzJDbJyzlYmlGvY53gdpyRfcGsI8TFI&e=> > . > > > > I also captured it in attached word doc for better readability. But if > there is any discrepancy (typo etc.), the official record in mailing list > should be used. > > > > All review process sounds good. > > > > Thanks > > Bin > > > > *From:* Lisa Caywood [mailto:lcayw...@opendaylight.org > <lcayw...@opendaylight.org>] > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 14, 2017 11:03 AM > *To:* HU, BIN <bh5...@att.com> > *Cc:* Gildas Lanilis <gildas.lani...@huawei.com>; Phil Robb < > pr...@linuxfoundation.org>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc < > onap-...@lists.onap.org> > *Subject:* Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] ONAP Release Naming Framework > Election Has Concluded - Global Cities Wins > > > > Folks, please confirm which are options for review. > > > > Please also note that usual practice is to do an informal review and > Google search for the terms to make sure there are no conflicts with these > names in the tech space, but NOT do a formal trademark search. I wanted to > make sure everyone is aware of this. A formal search would require > additional time (weeks, possibly) as well as budget. Please let me know if > there are any questions or concerns for this. > > > > Thanks, Lisa > > > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:10 PM, HU, BIN <bh5...@att.com> wrote: > > Note sure how “Amsterdam” was there. > > > > For the official record https://lists.onap.org/ > pipermail/onap-tsc/2017-May/000598.html > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_pipermail_onap-2Dtsc_2017-2DMay_000598.html&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6qPcDOqMgwf1K_r6YIIHhw&m=8Y1ubWphVMveg3lm64SS2irGIApN6wCbDYZxjk5Cc4g&s=gdIFXcHegxW9MzJDbJyzlYmlGvY53gdpyRfcGsI8TFI&e=>, > the original proposal was “*Anchorage*”. > > > > I didn’t see any other proposal on the public mailing list. > > > > The same holds true for “*Casablanca*”, “*Fiji*”, “*Guiling*” , “*Juarez*” > and “*Kyoto*”. All of those have official public record in mailing list. > Others don’t. > > > > Thanks > > Bin > > > > *From:* onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-bounces@ > lists.onap.org] *On Behalf Of *Gildas Lanilis > *Sent:* Monday, June 12, 2017 11:40 AM > *To:* Lisa Caywood <lcayw...@opendaylight.org>; Phil Robb < > pr...@linuxfoundation.org> > *Cc:* onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc <onap-...@lists.onap.org> > *Subject:* Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] ONAP Release Naming Framework > Election Has Concluded - Global Cities Wins > > > > Hi Lisa, > > > > I understand the concerns you brought up. However, we need your immediate > recommendations regarding the naming of our first release “Anchorage” or > “Amsterdam”. > > This is critical as we are using these names while discussing Release plan > and in our tool chain. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Gildas > > > > *[image: HuaweiLogowithName]* > > *Gildas Lanilis* > > *ONAP Release Manager* > > *gildas.lani...@huawei.com <gildas.lani...@huawei.com>* > > *Mobile: 1 415 238 6287 <(415)%20238-6287>* > > > > *From:* onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-bounces@ > lists.onap.org <onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>] *On Behalf Of *Lisa > Caywood > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 07, 2017 10:20 AM > *To:* Phil Robb > *Cc:* onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc > *Subject:* Re: [onap-tsc] ONAP Release Naming Framework Election Has > Concluded - Global Cities Wins > > > > For the record, Marketing had two concerns with Cities: > > > > 1) OpenStack also uses some cities, so we would need to ensure that our > names do not overlap with theirs. > > > > 2) Visual elements (for launch banners and other branding assets) - many > cities look like other big cities. We would want to ensure that each city > picked has a widely recognized landmark to anchor on. > > > > Obviously both of these are very manageable, just things to be aware of. > > > > Regards, Lisa > > > > On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 3:17 AM, Phil Robb <pr...@linuxfoundation.org> > wrote: > > Hello All: > > > > The Release Naming Framework election has concluded and the winner is > "Global Cities". > Result detailsHide details > > > > > > *1* > > *2* > > *3* > > *4* > > *5* > > *1. Global Cities* > > > > - > > *106* > > *117* > > *130* > > *147* > > *2. Scientists* > > > > *99* > > - > > *111* > > *131* > > *132* > > *3. Music Composers* > > > > *87* > > *82* > > - > > *108* > > *131* > > *4. Philosophers* > > > > *74* > > *51* > > *81* > > - > > *116* > > *5. Zodiac Signs* > > > > *55* > > *62* > > *63* > > *73* > > - > > > > Before we make it official, we need to run the idea by the Marketing Folks > to make sure they have no issues with it. > > > > I'll keep you posted. > > > > Thanks to all of those folks that voted. We had 210 votes all told. > > > > Best, > > > > Phil. > > -- > > Phil Robb > > Executive Director, OpenDaylight Project > > VP Operations - Networking & Orchestration, The Linux Foundation > > (O) 970-229-5949 <(970)%20229-5949> > > (M) 970-420-4292 <(970)%20420-4292> > > Skype: Phil.Robb > > > _______________________________________________ > ONAP-TSC mailing list > onap-...@lists.onap.org > https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Dtsc&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6qPcDOqMgwf1K_r6YIIHhw&m=DVXMpaJ_gxH24aikQU__yljruVBRbaxIRlIs59msHLA&s=jIsljt_HIKPjvFfe8ah6pTcx2FeOO1JhTyVKjju8Gyo&e=> > > > > > > -- > > *Lisa Caywood* > > Director of Ecosystem Development | OpenDaylight Project | > lcayw...@opendaylight.org | +1 408 857 3642 <(408)%20857-3642> > > > > > > -- > > *Lisa Caywood* > > Director of Ecosystem Development | OpenDaylight Project | > lcayw...@opendaylight.org | +1 408 857 3642 <(408)%20857-3642> > This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and > confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, > you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer > -- *Lisa Caywood* Director of Ecosystem Development | OpenDaylight Project | lcayw...@opendaylight.org | +1 408 857 3642
_______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
